tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8778769980042102612.post2512608232399522125..comments2023-11-08T23:43:26.075-05:00Comments on Everything and more: Atheist rightsmakitahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16946226160704777285noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8778769980042102612.post-55928764263903768212007-08-22T16:41:00.000-04:002007-08-22T16:41:00.000-04:00The headline of this thread is "Atheists Rights"so...The headline of this thread is "Atheists Rights"<BR/>so, whoever said "non-religious and Atheist are two different things" is correct, but totally off point.<BR/><BR/>This is a blog about atheists. I have pointed out the absurdity in the position. Your observation that non-religious is different is a non-sequitur and has no baring.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8778769980042102612.post-55254023793494669752007-08-22T15:52:00.000-04:002007-08-22T15:52:00.000-04:00Non-religious and Atheist are two different things...Non-religious and Atheist are two different things.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8778769980042102612.post-12823158339369884072007-07-14T12:52:00.000-04:002007-07-14T12:52:00.000-04:00Your response is curious. You appeal to things tha...Your response is curious. You appeal to things that 'make sense' and 'entitled'. Yet these terms are nonsense as is everything else if there is no god. Life is a random chemical accident, leading to nowhere and ultimately meaningless with no such thing as 'sense'. <BR/>Evolution suggests that life is based on the survival of the fittest, and 'rights' are inherent in 'might'. There is nothing 'Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8778769980042102612.post-3952976150545403972007-07-09T00:19:00.000-04:002007-07-09T00:19:00.000-04:00Why do you believe rights are inherent only by din...Why do you believe rights are inherent only by dint of a supreme being? That same rationale has been used to justify superior rights for different groups (e.g. divine right of kings, of one race over others, etc.). So what god requires as an inherent right wholly depends on the religion or the person who claims to speak for god. It's all made up anyhow.<BR/>"Inherent rights" are admittedly a Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8778769980042102612.post-56303141532728525082007-06-20T23:49:00.000-04:002007-06-20T23:49:00.000-04:00Atheists Rights? Isn't that an oxymoron?If there ...Atheists Rights? Isn't that an oxymoron?<BR/>If there is no god, there are no inherent 'rights', why should you have any? Just curious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com